[why, calvin, why?]
Now, don't get me wrong: I have nothing against bralessness myself. It can be very comfy, and sometimes is even the best way to go, visually. However, even though we ladies may not always NEED a bra, with a lot of tops or dresses, it just looks bad without. And here rests my dissatisfaction with the braless runway: often, letting the poor model's nips show through her clothes can be highly unflattering and distracting (not in a "oooh, boobies" way, but in a "oh yikes, too bad they didn't give her a bra under that" way). Models are supposed to be "hangers for the clothes," right? Since when do hangers have distracting chest poky-outies? Look at the dresses above! Isn't part of you cringing at the embarassing nipple interruptions, instead of admiring CK's skill? If we're supposed to see what the clothes look like on a body, for god's sake, Calvins of the world, show them they way that any sane woman would wear them, instead of altering the effect entirely by jarring our gaze. Do right by your designs & give them the most flattering foundations! If seeing a hint of feminine chest shape enhances the garment and the whole look, by all means. If not...every mall has Victoria's Secret. Go crazy.